« Previous|
Next »
 

I Want to Establish The Ron Swanson Scholarship In Women’s Studies

November 18, 2011

I’m so excited about last night’s episode of Parks and Recreation. In the first place, it was written by a woman (Chelsea Peretti, who’s also written for The Sarah Silverman Program) and directed by another woman (Nicole Holofcener, who’s done actual movies and stuff).  And the feminist cognoscenti have already recognized Leslie Knope as an even greater feminist icon than Liz Lemon.

(Not to toot my own horn, but I was on the forefront of Parks and Recreation gender criticism, showing my gender students “The Hunting Trip” episode as early as 2010, then subjecting them to Boskin’s theory of how playing stereotypes disingenuously is actually good for deflating them — watch as Leslie covers for a co-worker with stereotypical “feminine” excuses.)

Nick Offerman, the man who plays Ron Effing Swanson. NBC Photo: Mitchell Heath, from the {link: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/parks-recreation-nick-offerman-robin-givens-261879}Hollywood Reporter interview{/link}.

Lately Leslie’s’ political career has been occupying our attention* but if you were watching my Twitter stream last night, you’ll see that I was seriously geeking out, in real time, about Ron Swanson. I was ecstatic when he said to the camera, “I believe in the value of education.” I was thrilled when he pushed Andy to take challenging classes, rather than going for an easy A. And I just about lost it when it became apparent that while Andy was shopping around for classes, Ron was shopping around for lady professors — and liked the women’s studies professor best, declaring that he would propose to her if she weren’t so opposed to marriage. Yay, Ron!

The beauty of Ron’s character is that he’s manly enough to go for powerful women, as has been clearly established in previous episodes. And his interest in the women’s studies professor (who was talking about the oppressive nature of society) is completely believable given his libertarian beliefs. It doesn’t hurt that the actor who plays Swanson is unabashedly manly himself (read the interview with Nick Offerman) and that he’s married to Megan Mullaly, who is hella funny. I love that the character, the writing, and the directing came together so organically to create such greatness last night.

At the end of the episode, Andy decides to take the women’s studies class but can’t pay for it, so Ron makes Andy the recipient of the very first Ron Swanson Scholarship.

It’s decided, then: if I ever get rich, I am going to establish a Ron Swanson scholarship, for real. And it’s going to be in women’s studies, and it’s going to go to the candidate, male or female, who most represents the values that Ron Swanson stands for.

I think I’ll call it the Ron Effing Swanson Fellowship.

Who’s with me?

*Okay, regarding Leslie and Ben in this episode, I admit I initially had reaction similar to Alyssa Rosenberg’s, with the added concern that we’d fallen down the rom-com rabbit hole. But then I thought, Well hell, what would Don Draper have done? Or any other male character? The same thing, probably, except the other person wouldn’t be his boss. So I decided the writers couldn’t win, generically speaking.

10 Responses
  1. Alison says:

    Hurray! That’s great! I have to start watching that show more consistently. I love love love Amy Poehler, and I always find it sort of goofily exciting if Women’s Studies/Gender Studies even gets the tiniest mention in mainstream media.

    Please send me one of the Ron Effing Swanson Fellowship recipients!

    • wopro says:

      I totally understand, I geek out if there’s anything Classics-related in the news…and I admit I’m really really really hoping that we’ll see more of the Women’s Studies class in the future now that Andy’s enrolled. The show is totally worth it, at least once they’ve sucked you in and you care about the characters. You’ll be the first to know if I fund/find anyone worthy of the RESF!

  2. Historiann says:

    Effing hillarious, friend. I’m with you. Where do I send the check?

  3. [...] for a little Sunday morning light entertainment, see Amanda Krass, the Worst Professor Ever, on the feminism of Parks and Recreation and the overall awesomeness of Ron Effing Swanson, man’s man and feminist [...]

  4. Jane says:

    I love Parks and Rec, Amy Poehler, and this post!!!

  5. BP says:

    I agree… I definitely like how Ron Swanson is shaping up to be a genuine libertarian and not just a backwoods manly-man caricature. I also agree about how Leslie Knope is a better female icon than Liz Lemon. I get it from an intellectual standpoint, but I also just get annoyed at how much Tina Fey exploits the “This is a big deal because I’m a woman!” factor. Amy Poehler just seems to say, “I’m a nerd, I happen to be a woman, so what else is new?”

    • wopro says:

      That’s true, and I think it’s why his character is so believable. I agree about Leslie Knope, too, we’ve finally got a character that isn’t stereotypical….anything, I think, which is why she’s so awesome!

  6. Sbd says:

    Any idea who played the women’s study prof we only gkanc at in theend.

Leave a Reply

but try reading the comments policy first.